Young women's health behaviours in context: a qualitative longitudinal study in the Bukhali trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bukhali trial is being implemented with young women (18–28 years) in Soweto, South Africa. A qualitative longitudinal study was conducted to explore Bukhali trial participants' perceptions of health and their health behaviours over time and in the context of their life circumstances. This article reports an interpretation of interview data from a sub-sample of 11 of 35 participants who participated in four interviews conducted over 12 months. A longitudinal case analysis approach was applied, and four themes were developed: life circumstances, perceptions of health, health behaviours and changes, and experiences of the trial. Participants experienced largely challenging life circumstances characterised by instability and lack of security in terms of employment and education. Their health and health behaviour trajectories also lacked stability and were fragile. Data were also interpreted through the lens of a concept previously explored in Soweto and introduced in the final interview: ukuphumelela (‘flourishing’). This concept was useful for understanding the dominance of external or structural (versus internal or personal) factors and social dynamics influencing the health behaviour and life trajectories of participants, particularly in terms of success in the face of difficulty. Participants' experiences of the trial highlighted the critical role of support provided by, and trust established with, trial staff. This qualitative longitudinal approach provides unique perspectives on participants' experiences of the Bukhali trial over time, the importance of contextualising health behaviour change, and the instability impacting the participants, outcomes and implementation of Bukhali in Soweto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".