Outcomes After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Hemangioblastoma in Von Hippel-Lindau Disease and Sporadic Cases: An International Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hemangioblastomas (HGBs) are rare, benign, World Health Organization grade 1 vascular tumors, which are most commonly located in the cerebellum, and may occur sporadically or in association with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, a hereditary VHL-mutated tumor syndrome. Limited data are available regarding factors affecting outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We aim to provide a contemporary evaluation of SRS for HGBs through an international, multicenter study. In this study, we assess local tumor control and SRS-related complications in patients with intracranial HGBs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis from 17 centers was performed. Data on patient characteristics, SRS parameters, and outcomes were collected. The study included 104 patients with VHL and 89 sporadic cases, with 433 and 137 tumors, respectively. The median follow-up after the initial SRS was 52 months for patients with VHL and 44 months for sporadic cases. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 85% of VHL tumors and 76% of sporadic tumors. Radiation-induced changes were identified in 13 (3.5%) VHL cases and 5 (3.8%) sporadic cases. The overall 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidences of tumor progression were 13% and 22% for all tumors, 14% and 25% for VHL, and 13% and 17% for sporadic cases. Tumor progression was more common in cystic than in solid tumors in the sporadic group. Overall survival probability and progression-free survival were better in VHL cases compared with the sporadic group. Older age at SRS, male sex, and multiple tumors were associated with reduced local tumor control in all tumors and in the VHL group, whereas a margin dose >15 Gy was associated with improved local tumor control in both groups. CONCLUSION: SRS offers an effective treatment of intracranial HGBs, whether VHL-associated or sporadic, with a favorable risk profile. HGBs without a cystic component were more likely to be controlled after SRS in the sporadic group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".