MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411457087 · doi:10.24193/icu2022.32

Improve Skiing Race Competencies / Actual Aspects of preparation

2023· article· en· W4411457087 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonida Horea ȘTEFĂNESCU

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)Alpine skiingAeronauticsComputer scienceAllianceRace (biology)Focus (optics)Work (physics)TrajectoryQuality (philosophy)EngineeringSimulationMechanical engineeringPolitical scienceSociologyPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Junior slalom skiing is about to be a big disaster because the juniors only focus on attacking the pennant and deflecting it. In general, I believe in a logical, basic approach to ski racing, and I integrate the speed of a competitor because of the interaction between two essential components: the verticality of the slope and the approach to the turns. The competitor who gets the tightest line throughout the course will have the fastest speed, therefore, all technical elements of ski racing, including flag attack technique, should be oriented towards the race trajectory” (H. Nagler, ex-coach of Ingeman Stenmark, TV show) Technological progress (recorded in the superior quality of ski materials and equipment) has imposed significant changes recorded both in the competition technique and in the regulations for the conduct of ski competitions. (Canadian Ski Instructors Alliance, 2006)) The appearance of pennants/articulated/tilting gates induced important changes in the technique and trajectory of the competition. Due to the reduced impact force, skiers are less concerned with the consequences of contact with the pole, the main objective being to achieve a tighter race line. The technique of approaching articulated pennants has undergone numerous changes and is a current priority of technical and tactical training. The formation of the correct “attack” skill of the pennant is an essential aspect of preparing children for the competition, at this level the profile of the future highperformance competitor is formed. (Hirano, 2002) The present work aims to synthesize some current theoretical-methodological concepts related to the issue of optimizing the technical-tactical compartment at the level of 10-13-year-old children. The study also aims at validating the manner of effective optimization of the flag attack by inserting means and methods focused on the use of operational structures based on the use of roller skates and roller skis during the extra-season

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207