MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411457092 · doi:10.24193/icu2022.21

Reaction Times, Agility and Body Mass Index: Differences Between Boys and Girls in Multisport

2023· article· en· W4411457092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicola Mancini, Emilia Florina Grosu, Nicole MAUSSIER, Dario Colella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasketballTrainerTest (biology)PsychologyFootballBody mass indexPhysical therapyLower limbMedicineComputer scienceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Children who practice multiple sports in an organized form demonstrate higher levels of motor coordination when compared to children who regularly practice only one sport. In sporting and non-sporting situations, the ability to react in the shortest time to external stimuli, agility in changes of direction and physical characteristics, are important qualitative aspects that affect performance and success in growing boys and girls. Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare whether the multi-sport activity carried out for several years, may have created significant differences between males and females aged 11-12 years on agility, simple reaction times to visual stimuli and body mass index (BMI). Materials and methods: In the present study 96 students participated, of which 49 girls (age: 11.52 ± .51 years) and 47 boys (age: 11.48 ± .51 years) practicing different sports disciplines (football, athletics, basketball, volleyball). Agility was assessed through the hexagon agility test (HAT). The measurement of simple reaction times to visual stimuli for the dominant upper and lower limb was carried out through the tests: Reaction Time simple upper limb dominant (RTs UL) and Reaction Time simple lower limb dominant (RTs LL) using mobile instrumentation with led light discs and tablets (FITLIGHT Trainer ™ Sports Corp, Canada). Height and weight were measured for the BMI calculation. The Student's t test for independent samples was used to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of the two groups (male and female) independent of each other in each test administered. Statistical analyzes were performed using IBM SPSS vers. 25 for Windows. Results: In the comparison of the means of the results in all the tests administered and in the calculation of the BMI, no statistically significant difference was found for both sexes. Conclusion and recommendations: Boys and girls between the ages of 11 and 12 who regularly practice multi-sport have high levels of motor performance and a good state of physical fitness but it must be specified that the ability to react to visual stimuli in the shortest possible time and that of being more agile does not seem to depend on gender at this stage of growth. These indications are useful for implementing methodological interventions aimed at improving the ability to process information and more performing motor responses with similar interventions without distinction of gender

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207