MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411458251 · doi:10.1111/ppe.70035

Fenton Third‐Generation Growth Charts of Preterm Infants Without Abnormal Fetal Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2025· review· en· W4411458251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational ageAnthropometryFetal growthGestationPercentileObstetricsPopulationBirth weightPediatricsPregnancyMeta-analysisSmall for gestational ageEnvironmental healthStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Experts recommend assessing preterm infant growth against fetal growth patterns. However, obtaining accurate estimates of healthy fetal growth from preterm infants is challenging as many had intrauterine faltering growth. OBJECTIVES: To improve preterm infant growth assessments by developing Fenton third-generation sex-specific preterm growth charts based on anthropometric distributions of preterm infants without abnormal fetal growth. We also aimed to evaluate the consistency of the new charts' growth velocities. DATA SOURCES: From the last search for the 2013 Fenton growth charts to November 2024, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, grey literature, as well as US Vital statistics and iNeo Consortium. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We followed systematic review methodology to identify population-based sex-specific anthropometric estimates of preterm cohorts without abnormal fetal growth beginning ≤ 24 weeks of gestation. Specified a priori, outcomes included newborn sex-specific estimates of birthweight, length, and head circumference. SYNTHESIS: We followed PRISMA guidelines. Literature screening and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. We harmonised weight, length, and head circumference weighted-average meta-analyses with the World Health Organization growth standard and rescaled the charts' x-axis from completed gestational weeks to exact gestational age (weeks and days). RESULTS: Seven studies from 15 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, United Kingdom and United States) were included, representing 4.8 million births 22-42 weeks of gestation. 174,184 were < 30 weeks gestational age. The Fenton third-generation preterm growth charts' weights showed improved growth velocity across percentiles with consistent declines for weight, length and head circumference velocity as post-menstrual age increased. The birthweight meta-analysis curves had similar shapes to fetal ultrasound estimates. CONCLUSIONS: The Fenton third-generation preterm infant growth chart curves demonstrate improved and more uniform slopes across percentiles and closer alignment with fetal ultrasound estimates, offering a growth standard for preterm infants. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024589756.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it