MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Impact of Enhancing Cognitive Skills on Social Skills Development in Traumatic Brain Injury patients

2025· preprint· en· W4411475873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Basim Abu Ghalieh, Maram AlBargothi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryCognitionCognitive skillPsychologySocial skillsClinical psychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuroscienceDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective: This study investigates the effectiveness of an 8-week structured cognitive and social skills training program in improving cognitive function, communication, and functional independence among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Qatar. The goal is to assess the program’s impact on real-world reintegration and quality of life, contributing to evidence-based rehabilitation strategies in this population. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from TBI patients aged 15–65 who were admitted to the Adult Day Rehabilitation Unit at Qatar Rehabilitation Institute between January 2022 and December 2024. All participants demonstrated cognitive and communication impairments and completed a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program that included individualized speech-language and occupational therapy. Outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognitive function, Functional Communication Measures (FCMs) for communication and social interaction, and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for overall functional status and return-to-work or school outcomes. Data were collected at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up. Results: Post-rehabilitation assessments showed significant improvements across all outcome domains. Participants demonstrated measurable cognitive gains (MoCA), enhanced communication and social function (FCMs), and greater independence (FIM), with many successfully reintegrating into work or academic environments. Conclusions: The findings support the efficacy of integrated cognitive-social rehabilitation for TBI patients, highlighting the benefits of collaborative sessions between speech-language pathologists and occupational therapists. The program demonstrated real-life functional gains, reinforcing the value of multidisciplinary interventions in promoting recovery and social reintegration post-TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth and Well-being Studies→French-language works237,207→