MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411483061 · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102515

Timing of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Stable Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure

2025· article· en· W4411483061 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Villaschi, Christian Basile, Lina Benson, Paolo Gatti, W. Todd Abraham, Michael Böhm, Biykem Bozkurt, Javed Butler, Gianluigi Condorelli, Cecilia Linde, Marco Metra, Wilfried Müllens, Peter G. M. Mol, Shelley Zieroth, R Scorza, Lars H. Lund, Fredrik Gadler, Gianluigi Savarese

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeMedtronicHjärt-LungfondenSapheon
KeywordsMedicineCardiac resynchronization therapyHeart failureLogistic regressionInternal medicineCardiologyProportional hazards modelMedical therapyPopulationGuidelineEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Guidelines' recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in selected patients with heart failure (HF) exist. However, data on the best timing for CRT implantation after the achievement of stable medical therapy (SMT) and its association with outcomes are currently lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of CRT implantation after the achievement of SMT, associated patient profiles, and clinical outcomes in a real-world HF population. METHODS: Patients with HF treated with SMT derived from the Swedish ICD and Pacemaker Registry who received CRT between 2007 and 2020 were included in the study. Patient characteristics associated with a shorter or longer time to CRT implantation were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, and associations between the time from SMT to CRT implantation and clinical outcomes (mortality and morbidity) were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 9,409 patients, 43.8% received CRT at <3 months of achieving SMT, 34.9% between 3 and 9 months, and 21.3% after 9 months. The time from SMT to CRT implantation decreased significantly over the study period. Independent determinants of shorter time to implantation included recent HF hospitalization, previous implantation of a defibrillator, and greater use of guideline-directed medical therapy, whereas a history of HF >6 months and ischemic heart disease were associated with a longer time. After adjustments, there was a 9% lower risk of cardiovascular death with a shorter time from SMT to CRT implantation of <3 months vs 3-9 months (P = 0.045). A delayed time of >9 months vs 3-9 months was associated with a 13% higher risk of cardiovascular death/HF hospitalization, a 12% higher risk of cardiovascular death (P = 0.040), and an 11% higher risk of first HF hospitalization (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Time from the achievement of SMT to CRT implantation decreased over the study period. Delayed CRT implantation beyond 3 months was associated with higher cardiovascular mortality compared with earlier implantation after GDMT optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Heart FailureSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207