MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411483649 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202411-2146oc

Increased Driving Pressure During Assisted Ventilation for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Is Associated with Lower ICU Survival: The ICEBERG Study

2025· article· en· W4411483649 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Grassi, Isabella Bianchi, Maddalena Teggia Droghi, Sara Miori, Eleonora Balzani, Idunn S. Morris, Dirk Schädler, Tobias Becher, Manuel Valdivia Marchal, Josefina Serrano, Oriol Caritg, Oriol Roca, Eduardo Leite Vieira Costa, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Fernando Barriga, Rollin Roldán, Andrea Boffi, Lise Piquilloud, Gregory J. Mitchon, Guido Musch, Simone Piva, Michele Bertoni, Luigi Castagna, Giacomo Grasselli, Matteo Riccardo, Savino Spadaro, Ciprian Niță, Bairbre McNicholas, Michael C. Sklar, Aurora Magliocca, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, John G. Laffey, Laurent Brochard, Ewan C. Goligher, Giacomo Bellani

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSt. Michael's HospitalToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranspulmonary pressureTidal volumeMechanical ventilationVentilation (architecture)Mean airway pressureAnesthesiaPeak inspiratory pressurePositive end-expiratory pressureRespiratory physiologyRespiratory failureCardiologyRespiratory systemInternal medicineLung volumesLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Driving pressure (ΔP) is a marker of severity and a possible target for lung protection during controlled ventilation, but its value during assisted ventilation is unknown. Inspiratory holds provide an estimate of ΔP that is quasi-static. Expiratory holds provide an estimate of the inspiratory effort, which is useful to estimate the transpulmonary dynamic ΔP. Objectives To assess the correlation between ΔPs measured during assisted ventilation and ICU outcomes. Methods Multicenter prospective observational study. Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were enrolled within 48 hours of triggering the ventilator. Respiratory mechanics were measured daily, and the variables of interest were averaged over the first 3 days of partial assistance. ICU outcomes were collected until Day 90. Measurements and Main Results A total of 298 patients from 16 centers were enrolled. Vt, peak airway pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, and inspiratory effort during the first 3 days of assisted ventilation did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors. Quasi-static ΔP and transpulmonary dynamic ΔP were higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (13 [IQR, 11–14] vs. 11 [9–13] cm H2O [P < 0.001]; and 19 [16–23] vs. 16 [13–18] cm H2O [P < 0.001], respectively), whereas compliance normalized to predicted body weight was lower (0.65 [0.54–0.84] vs. 0.79 [0.64–0.97] mL/cm H2O/kg; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the association with outcomes. During the study days, static ΔP significantly diverged between survivors and nonsurvivors. Conclusions During assisted ventilation, ΔP and normalized compliance are associated with ICU outcome, despite some overlap. Although our study does not allow an estimation of whether ΔP is a marker of severity or a cause of lung injury, it highlights the potential value of monitoring and targeting it during spontaneous assisted breathing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207