MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411493616 · doi:10.1192/bjo.2025.10088

Economic Evaluation of a Novel Physical Healthcare Advice and Guidance Service in a Mental Health Trust

2025· article· en· W4411493616 on OpenAlexaff
Eoin Gogarty, Ge Yu, Ioannis Bakolis, Ray McGrath, Fiona Gaughran

Bibliographic record

VenueBJPsych Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthMedicineObservational studyPopulationHealth careInpatient careFamily medicinePopulation healthPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: People with severe mental illnesses experience poorer physical health outcomes compared with the general population, partially related to fragmented care. The Integrating our Mental and Physical Healthcare Systems project implemented an Advice and Guidance Line, supported by colleagues in King’s Health Partners, using the Consultant Connect (CC) app in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust to enhance collaborative physical healthcare. This study evaluates the app’s impact on inpatient transfers from mental health wards to acute hospitals, focusing on clinical outcomes and cost savings. Methods: This cost-minimisation analysis used retrospective observational data to analyse electronic health records across a 42-month period (21 months pre- and post-intervention) centred on the CC introduction date in June 2020. The study population was Trust adult inpatients during the study period. Outcome measures were the number of Trust inpatients who attended ED in, or were admitted to, one of the four acute NHS Trusts serving the catchment area. Transfers with a primary COVID-19 diagnosis were excluded. Outcomes are presented as the number of transfers per Trust inpatient bed-year. This divisor accounts for the decrease in bed-days during the pandemic. Results: In the pre-CC period there were 5,472 Trust inpatients across 7,308 inpatient episodes (1,328.78 bed-years) with 1,834 ED transfers. Post-CC the Trust had 5,362 inpatients across 7,396 episodes (1,183.06 bed-years) with 530 ED transfers. The number of ED transfers per bed-year was 1.38 in the pre-CC period, and 0.45 in the post-CC period, a 68% reduction (p<0.001, Chi-square). Interrupted time-series analysis confirmed this decrease (−0.752, 95%CI [−1.117, −0.386], p<0.001). There was no significant difference in admission rates pre- and post-intervention. Based on recent annual bed occupancy (720.97 bed-years) and costs (£457 per ED transfer), CC prevents approximately 670 transfers annually, generating total Trust savings of £241,720 after deducting annual service costs (£61,698) and annualised implementation costs (£3,000). Conclusion: While the pandemic contributed to an initial decrease in ED transfers, the reduction was sustained even as overall ED presentations at the four hospitals returned to pre-pandemic levels. There was no change in admissions to acute Trusts, suggesting that the level of care provided was appropriate to need. The Advice and Guidance model appears cost-effective in managing physical health within mental health settings. These findings support wider implementation of similar services across mental health trusts, though further evaluation in a post-pandemic context is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJPsych OpenSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207