MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411504606 · doi:10.1007/s00402-025-05958-x

The effectiveness of 6-week superimposed neuromuscular electrical stimulation in knee osteoarthritis: an assessor blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

2025· article· en· W4411504606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oğuzhan Mete, Ayşegül Yaman, Çiğdem Zaman, Mustafa Ertuğrul Yaşa, Selman Aktaş, Emre Adıgüzel

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialOsteoarthritisOrthopedic surgeryPhysical therapyDouble blindedClinical trialBlinded studyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is crucial for alleviating patient complaints and postponing disability from the onset of symptoms until the disease progresses to the point where surgery is inevitable. Although as a part of conservative management, Superimposed Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (sNMES), which combines electrical stimulation with voluntary contraction, has gained popularity in clinical practice, the effects of sNMES in KOA are unknown. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the effects of sNMES in patients with KOA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight participants with KOA were randomly divided into three groups (sNMES + CP (conventional physiotherapy), NMES (Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation) + CP, and only CP). The treatments lasted 3 times for 6 weeks. Before and after treatments, the quadriceps and femoral cartilage thickness, sensorimotor function (balance and proprioception), physical function (quadriceps muscle strength, knee range of motion, and 30-second sit-to-stand test), and functional status (Short Form-36 (SF36) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)) were evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding timeXgroup effect when comparing groups, the sNMES + CP showed significant improvements over NMES + CP and only CP in quadriceps muscle strength (p < 0.01), SF36_Energy (p < 0.01), and SF36_Social Functioning (p < 0.01). Both the sNMES + CP (p < 0.01) and only CP groups (p < 0.01) showed significant changes in SF36_Pain scores, while all groups had significant reductions in WOMAC Scores (p < 0.05), with the sNMES + CP group showing the greatest improvement (p < 0.01). No adverse effects were reported in all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: sNMES + CP proved more effective than NMES + CP or only CP in enhancing quadriceps muscle strength and improving functional status. Incorporating sNMES instead of NMES into CP could be a more effective intervention for treating KOA, particularly when the goal is to enhance quadriceps strength, thereby improving functional status. In conservative management of KOA, collaboration between orthopedists and physiatrists is crucial for addressing functional improvement regarding the effect of sNMES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgerySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207