MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411508418 · doi:10.1159/000546449

EASO Position Statement: Women with Obesity across the Reproductive Life – Fertility, Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding

2025· review· en· W4411508418 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Filippi-Arriaga, Nidhi Agarwal, Diana Martins, Mariana P. Monteiro, Emilia Huvinen, Sara G. I. Suliman, Barbara McGowan, Andreea Ciudin

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Facts · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityPregnancyPolycystic ovaryBreastfeedingObstetricsFertilityBioelectrical impedance analysisGynecologyBody mass indexPopulationPediatricsEnvironmental healthEndocrinologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obesity management in women presents distinct challenges across their lifespan. However, there is limited evidence or recommendations focused solely on women living with obesity. Summary: This European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) position statement is based on an expert comprehensive review and summary of the available scientific evidence on women living with obesity. It aims to guide the health and medical assessment of these women during their reproductive life (fertility, preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding). Key Messages: 1. To better diagnose obesity in women beyond BMI, the use of at least one additional anthropometric measure, like waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), is strongly recommended. When available, the use of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis is encouraged. 2. Women with obesity should be offered obesity management counseling and psychological support. 3. Obesity can negatively impact fertility; weight loss of 5-10% over 6 months improves fertility. 4. In women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), treatment with metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists or surgery can be considered. 5. Current recommendations for pregestational obesity suggest a gestational weight gain (GWG) of 5-9 kg. Lower GWG targets should be considered, particularly for class II or III obesity. 6. There is limited clinical data on the safety and efficacy of obesity medication during pregnancy or lactation. 7. All pregnant women with obesity should be offered prenatal screening for fetal anomalies, with discussion of the potential limitations of diagnostic tests and additional growth ultrasounds offered on an individual basis. 8. All pregnant women with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 should be screened for gestational diabetes in early pregnancy. Measures to prevent preeclampsia should be taken and the need for thromboprophylaxis assessed. 9. Intrapartum fetal surveillance is recommended during active labor. 10. Postpartum weight management is needed to mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes for the mother and for subsequent pregnancies. The assessment of appropriate contraceptive methods during the postpartum and breastfeeding period is crucial. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0210.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity FactsSame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207