MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411516892 · doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2025.102472

Contribution of Post-Rolling Surface Treatment to Corrosion Performance of Duplex and Austenitic Stainless Steel Reinforcing Bar

2025· article· en· W4411516892 on OpenAlex
Seyiwa Kope, Mohaddeseh Abdolhosseini, Ibrahim G. Ogunsanya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterialia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooHudbay Minerals (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceDuplex (building)MetallurgyAusteniteBar (unit)CorrosionSteel barAustenitic stainless steelComposite materialMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study elucidates the complex relationship between stainless steel (SS) rebar surface treatment and corrosion resistance in high chloride environments using microscopy, analytical, and conventional electrochemical and novel corrosion microscopy techniques in a short- and long-term assessment. Previous studies on carbon steel reported that millscale defects (cracks and porosity) compromise corrosion resistance by allowing chloride ions to reach the base steel. This study examining three SS grades with four different surface type shows that their high Cr content improves compactness and reduces defectiveness of the inner (Fe-Cr) millscale layer, resulting in better corrosion resistance which varied with surface treatment methods, alloy composition, concrete composition, and chloride exposure method. Despite its defective outer (Fe) millscale layer, as-rolled (AR) bars showed comparable or better corrosion resistance than bars subjected to post-rolling treatment. Treating SS surface with mechanical blasting or acid pickling alone deteriorates corrosion performance due to embedment of blasting particles into rebar surface and/or the presence of loose residual millscale. Employing both shotblasting and acid pickling (SBPK) causes micropits to develop on the bar surface, which deteriorates corrosion resistance. Pore solution tests do not adequately reflect corrosion performance of millscales, as they exhibit high corrosion rate upon uniform exposure to chloride but show better performance in long-term mortar/concrete tests due to longer equilibration of the millscale and passive film with concrete’s high pH environment and non-uniform chloride exposure to rebar surface. Overall, this work shows that achieving consistent post-roll treatment or pristine SBPK surface between manufacturers and batches is a bigger challenge than achieving homogeneous millscale, making AR SS rebar a cost-effective corrosion resistant option for construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it