MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Термін «Голодомор» у наукових і публіцистичних текстах української діаспори (1960 – 1980-ті рр.)

2025· article· en· W4411520696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mykhailo Kostiv

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianDiasporaNewspaperPolitical scienceGermanNoveltyConsolidation (business)Media studiesSociologyHistoryLawLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the article is to examine the dynamics of the use of the term Holodomor in scholarly and media publications by the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada and the United States during the 1960s – 1980s, as well as to identify the key factors that contributed to its gradual consolidation in the historical discourse outside Ukraine. The methodology of the research. The research employs a comparative method to examine the dynamics of the term «Holodomor» in Ukrainian diaspora publications (historical documents, academic publications, newspapers, and public statements). Scientific novelty. The research reflects how the term «Holodomor» became established in the public discourse of the Ukrainian diaspora. It also highlights the contribution of scholars, public figures, and journalists in shaping and disseminating the concept of Holodomor as genocide. Conclusions. One of the earliest recorded uses of «Holodomor» was found in Mykhailo Marunchak’s 1963 work The System of German Concentration Camps and the Policy of Extermination in Ukraine. The term gained wider recognition in the 1980s, particularly in Ukrainian publications in Canada. Marunchak’s 1985 book A Nation in the Struggle for its Existence used the term «Holodomor» over 70 times. Additionally, an early instance of the phrase «Ukrainian Holodomor-Genocide» was discovered in a Winnipeg publication of the 1980s. In Ukraine, the term «Holodomor» became widely adopted in public and academic discourse from the late 1980s and early 1990s. The research confirms that the term «Holodomor» was gradually established within the Ukrainian diaspora before gaining broader recognition in Ukraine. By the 1980s, the term had become dominant in diaspora publications, contributing to international awareness of the famine as genocide. This study provides a foundation for further research into the linguistic and historiographical evolution of the term and its role in shaping collective memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series HistorySame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207