DAGUSIBU untuk Desa Sehat: Edukasi Pengelolaan Obat yang Benar bagi Karang Taruna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rendahnya tingkat pemahaman masyarakat terkait cara memperoleh, menggunakan, menyimpan, dan membuang obat secara benar menjadi tantangan serius dalam menjaga kesehatan dan kelestarian lingkungan. Kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan meningkatkan literasi pengelolaan obat yang aman di kalangan Karang Taruna Desa Ciputri melalui pendekatan edukasi berbasis komunitas dengan mengedepankan prinsip DAGUSIBU (Dapatkan, Gunakan, Simpan, dan Buang). Program dilaksanakan melalui sosialisasi interaktif, simulasi, serta pendampingan yang didukung dengan media edukasi cetak dan digital. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan pengetahuan dan keterampilan peserta, terbentuknya kader Duta Literasi Obat, serta meningkatnya kesadaran masyarakat terhadap pentingnya pengelolaan obat yang tepat. Rekomendasi utama mencakup pendampingan berkelanjutan, penguatan peran perpustakaan sebagai pusat edukasi, serta kolaborasi lintas sektor guna memperluas jangkauan dan dampak edukasi ini.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".