MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411531023 · doi:10.1186/s13071-025-06867-z

Significant variations in tolerance to clothianidin and pirimiphos-methyl in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus populations during a dramatic malaria resurgence despite sustained indoor residual spraying in Uganda

2025· article· en· W4411531023 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ambrose Oruni, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, James Adiga, Geoffrey Otto, Patrick Kyagamba, Joseph Okoth, Daniel Ayo, Jackson Rwatooro Asiimwe, Maato Zedi, John Rek, Kyle J. Walker, Ashlee Braithwaite, Jonathan Kayondo, Melissa D. Conrad, Teun Bousema, Mark J. I. Paine, Hanafy M. Ismail, Paul J. Krezanoski, Charles S. Wondji, Moses R. Kamya, Grant Dorsey, Martin J. Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenueParasites & Vectors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsBiologyAnopheles gambiaeIndoor residual sprayingClothianidinMalariaAnophelesParasitologyToxicologyEcologyZoologyPesticidePlasmodium falciparumImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: A dramatic malaria resurgence occurred in areas of Uganda between 2020 and 2022, coinciding with the switch to clothianidin-based formulations for indoor residual spraying. During the resurgence, Anopheles funestus sensu lato (s.l.) numbers increased more than those of Anopheles gambiae s.l., but when an alternative insecticide, pirimiphos-methyl, was reintroduced in 2023, both malaria cases and An. funestus mosquito density fell. METHODS: In this study, we investigated possible causes of the resurgence by assessing (1) whether sufficient quantities of insecticide were sprayed, (2) the residual insecticide bio-efficacy against wild mosquitoes, and (3) the insecticide susceptibility of both key vector populations using standard test tube assays and wall cone assays. RESULTS: ), with significant variations between sampling rounds and wall types. Mud walls had the lowest residual concentration of insecticides, and the lowest observed mortality in wall cone assays, compared to burnt bricks with plaster/cement/paint. In the studies of residual bio-efficacy, by World Health Organization (WHO) definitions, An. funestus s.l. showed resistance to clothianidin (< 80% mortality) up to 11 months, and susceptibility to pirimiphos-methyl (> 90% mortality) when exposed to wall surfaces up to 7 months post-spray. In WHO tube tests, variations were observed in susceptibility to clothianidin in An. funestus s.l. populations using dose- and time-response assays (80-98% mortality). In 2022, An. gambiae s.l. was largely susceptible to the clothianidin-based formulation Sumishield (85-90% mortality), although the levels dropped slightly in 2023 (60-85% mortality), mainly in mud and pole houses. In contrast, An. gambiae s.l. was highly susceptible with mild tolerance to the pirimiphos-methyl-based formulation Actellic (~ 80% mortality), and time-response assays showed that An. gambiae s.l. populations had very low knockdown and mortality at lower exposure time compared to An. funestus s.l. Regression models showed a positive association between residual insecticide concentration (RIC) and mortality in houses sprayed with Sumishield but not Actellic houses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possible variations observed in spray operations, the study revealed that An. funestus s.l. exhibited a higher tolerance to clothianidin-based formulations compared to An. gambiae s.l., and this might have driven the malaria resurgence observed in Uganda. However, there are signals of An. gambiae s.l. resistance to pirimiphos-methyl, which will require further investigation and monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParasites & VectorsSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207