MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411531629 · doi:10.1029/2024je008799

The Meter‐Scale Roughness of Asteroid (101955) Bennu From the OSIRIS‐REx Laser Altimeter

2025· article· en· W4411531629 on OpenAlexafffund
F. M. Rossmann, C. L. Johnson, E. B. Bierhaus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsAsteroidImpact craterGeologySurface roughnessAltimeterSurface finishScale (ratio)RidgeRoot mean squareGeometryGeodesyAstrobiologyPhysicsMaterials sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Asteroid (101955) Bennu is a near‐Earth, potentially hazardous, rubble pile asteroid, and was the primary target of the NASA OSIRIS‐REx mission. The surface is dominated by the expression of boulders and has been heavily modified by impact cratering. Here, we analyze surface roughness, calculated using data from the OSIRIS‐REx Laser Altimeter, to investigate spatial variations in boulders and finer‐grained material across Bennu globally. Surface roughness is a statistical measure of change in surface height over a given baseline (horizontal spatial scale) and can be used to gain insight into the geologic processes that form and modify the surface over different scales. We calculate surface roughness at baselines of 0.20–20 m using the root‐mean‐square (RMS) deviation. We find that Bennu's surface roughness is self‐affine over length scales between 0.2 m and 1.0 m, and between 1.0 and 20.0 m. We also find that surface roughness varies spatially and is dominated by the local size‐frequency distribution of boulders. At the longest baselines, roughness is produced by the prominent equatorial ridge and the topographic relief of Bennu's largest boulders. At baselines between 0.20 and 2.0 m, the interiors of craters with diameters less than 25 m tend to be smooth compared with larger craters and the average background, supporting the presence of a finer‐grained subsurface layer. Our results extend previous LiDAR‐based asteroid roughness studies of (25143) Itokawa and (433) Eros to baselines more than 10 times shorter, and to an asteroid with different spectral class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207