Surgical pathology of diffuse parenchymal lung disease in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that mainly affects older adults. Pulmonary disease in PMR is rare but may be under-recognized and pathological descriptions thereof are few. We aimed to characterize diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) in PMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Institutional archives were searched for patients having PMR and DPLD with lung tissue sampling. After excluding cases with infection, concomitant rheumatoid arthritis, or smoking-related DPLD only, 11 patients (9 women, median age 75 years) were enrolled. Clinical history and pathology slides were reviewed. One of the 11 patients (9%) had concomitant giant cell arteritis; the remaining patients had no other rheumatological diseases. All had been treated for PMR with immunosuppression, and most presented years later (median 6 years) with non-specific respiratory symptoms. Radiographically, bilateral ground-glass opacities and reticulation were typical and were usually lower lobe predominant. Histologically, fibrosis was seen in 8 of 11 (73%) patients and was unclassifiable in four; non-specific interstitial pneumonia was encountered in three patients, and usual interstitial pneumonia was seen in only one case. Evidence of acute lung injury occurred in 9 (82%) patients, including three with acute lung injury only, usually manifesting as organizing pneumonia. Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage was seen in four cases (29%), including two patients with haemoptysis and capillaritis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data corroborate prior reports of clinically significant DPLD in some patients with PMR. Histopathological findings mirror other rheumatological disorders and include diffuse alveolar haemorrhage with capillaritis. Additional studies are warranted to clarify the association between PMR and DPLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".