MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411540718 · doi:10.7554/elife.106402.1

HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses soon after treatment initiation during acute HIV infection are associated with viral reservoir decline

2025· preprint· en· W4411540718 on OpenAlexaff
Pien M van Paassen, Alexander Pasternak, Karel A. van Dort, Ad C. van Nuenen, Irma Maurer, Brigitte Boeser‐Nunnink, Ninée VEJ Buchholtz, Tokameh Mahmoudi, Cynthia Lungu, Reinout van Crevel, Casper Rokx, Jori Symons, Monique Nijhuis, Annelou van der Veen, Liffert Vogt, Michelle J. Klouwens, Jan M. Prins, Neeltje A. Kootstra, Godelieve J. de Bree

Bibliographic record

VenueeLife · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8Immune systemImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Cytotoxic T cellAntiretroviral therapyViral loadVirologyCD4-CD8 RatioT cellBiologyCellMedicineLymphocyte subsetsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiated in the acute phase of HIV infection (AHI) results in a smaller viral reservoir. However, the impact of early HIV-specific T-cell responses on long-term reservoir dynamics is less well characterized. Therefore, we measured the size of the viral reservoir and functionality of HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses after the acute phase at 24 and 156 weeks after ART initiation in individuals who were diagnosed during AHI. A significant decline in total and defective HIV DNA and a trend towards a decline in intact HIV DNA were observed between 24 and 156 weeks. Functional CD8+ T-cell responses against HIV peptides Env, Gag, Nef, and Pol were maintained over three years after treatment initiation. The proliferative capacity of HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells at 24 weeks was associated with the decline of total and defective HIV DNA reservoir, suggesting that HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells may at least partially drive the decline of the viral reservoir. Therefore, enforcing HIV-specific immune responses as early as possible after diagnosis of AHI should be a central focus of HIV cure strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeLife→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→