MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411544045 · doi:10.1134/s2075111725700158

Risk Assessment, Potential Distribution, and Public Interest of Allergenic Weed, Common Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., Invasive to South Africa

2025· article· en· W4411544045 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tinyiko C. Shivambu, Moleseng C. Moshobane, Ndivhuwo Shivambu, Takalani Nelufule, Nimmi Seoraj-Pillai, Tshifhiwa Constance Nangammbi

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Biological Invasions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbrosia artemisiifoliaRagweedWeedAmbrosiaInvasive speciesBiologyDistribution (mathematics)Introduced speciesBotanyAgronomyEcologyPollenMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., commonly known as common ragweed, is one of the world’s widely distributed invasive vascular proliferous weed plants. The establishment of this plant is mainly associated with myriad introductory pathways, which is worrisome given that the species is expanding globally, including countries with limited resources. In this study, we use the Australian Weed Risk Assessment (AWRA) to determine the potential impacts of common ragweed in South Africa. Species distribution modelling (SDM) was applied to determine areas likely to be climatically suitable for this weed under current and future climatic scenarios. Lastly, we used Google Trends to examine the global interest of online public members regarding invasive ragweed topics. The AWRA score was high (32/49) for this weed, suggesting high risk, particularly in the environment (Score: 23) and agricultural production sectors (Score: 24). Our SDM revealed that A. artemisiifolia has wide climatic tolerance and both current and future scenarios showed slight changes in predictions. Google Trends showed that common ragweed was the most trending term, with the highest relative search hits (100%) between 2004 and 2009. Common ragweeds and weeds (both ranked 100%) were the most related search queries, followed by ragweed allergy and allergies, with relative hits ranked 74 and 54%, respectively. Of the 17 countries and one island, the United States of America, Austria, Canada, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon Islands had the highest relative search hits, ranging between 75 and 100%. Our results recommended prioritising this species for clearing due to its high risk to the recipient system and climatic suitability. It is worth mentioning that incorporating Google Trends in this study provided a vital understanding of human interest and behaviour towards invasive common ragweed on a global scale. We, therefore, recommended that common ragweed be included in the national list of prohibited species so that management and surveillance for early detection are provided before it expands to uninvaded ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Biological InvasionsSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207