MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gi activation in cardiomyocytes reverses cardiac damage induced by adrenergic overload

2025· article· en· W4411544175 on OpenAlexaff
Marcos Eliezeck, Sérgio Scalzo, Vânia Costa, Thaís Marques da Silva, Carlos Alberto Aguiar Silva, Cibele Rocha‐Resende, Rubens Fazan, Hélio César Salgado, Marco A. M. Prado, Silvia Carolina Guatimosim Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdrenergicPressure overloadInternal medicineCardiologyMedicineEndocrinologyHeart failureChemistryCell biologyBiologyCardiac hypertrophyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key modulators of cardiac function. Hyperactive Gs and Gq pathways are linked to cardiac disease, while Gi activation via ACh binding to muscarinic type 2 receptors promotes cardioprotection. We aimed to selectively activate Gi signaling in cardiomyocytes (CMs) to assess its therapeutic potential in a adrenergic overload-induced cardiac damage model. To selectively activate Gi in CMs, we crossed the R26-LSL-Gi-hMD4i model with Myh6-CRE, creating a Myh6-Cre/hM4Di mice, in which upon N-Oxide-Clozapine (CNO) stimulation activates Gi selectively in cardiomyocytes (CMs). Male and female mice (8 weeks old) were subjected to: Protocol 1: CMs were isolated, electrically stimulated to contract, and treated with Isoproterenol (ISO 50nmol/L), ACh, or CNO (100nmol/L). Protocol 2: Myh6-Cre/hM4Di mice were treated in vivo with ISO (25 mg/kg/day) with or without CNO (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 7 days. Mice were sacrificed on day 8. The data was derived from at least three independent experiments. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For normal data, an unpaired Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used. For non-normal data, the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test was applied, followed by the Games-Howell post hoc test when appropriate. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied. To confirm the activation of the Gi pathway in CMs the cells were exposed to CNO or ACh (positive control for Gi), and contraction was recorded. Myh6-Cre/hM4Di cells exhibited reduced shortening area after CNO stimulation, while no effect was observed in cells from Myh6-CRE or hM4Di littermate mice. Next, we investigated whether Gi activation in CMs could attenuate the ISO-induced tissue injury in vivo (protocol 2). CNO treatment of Myh6-Cre/hM4Di mice prevented ISO-induced pathological cardiac remodeling, including hypertrophy, inflammation and fibrosis. To explore whether Gi activation could reverse pre-existing cardiac injury, we started CNO injection on day 4 of a 7-day ISO treatment, at a stage when cell death and inflammation were already occurring. We found that late CNO treatment reversed ISO-induced cardiac and CM hypertrophy. Flow cytometry analyses showed a reduction in inflammatory cells, which directly impacted the fibrotic and functional cardiac outcomes. This was evidenced by fewer myofibroblasts, reduced collagen I and III transcripts, and improved echocardiographic parameters, confirming the efficacy of late CNO treatment in cardiac recovery. These results demonstrate, for the first time that targeted Gi activation in CMs protects against adrenergic overload-induced cardiac injury, highlighting CM-Gi's role in cardiac repair. CNPq, CAPES e FAPEMIG This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207