Global burden and characterization of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: results from a systematic review and a multi-center cohort study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To compare and characterize hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) across the geographical regions, we conducted a systematic review and a multi-center cohort study. We conducted a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of studies reporting HTG-AP. Also, we separately characterized HTG-AP in a multi-center retrospective cohort study involving eight centers in China. The key outcomes of interest included the pooled proportion of HTG-AP and its severity parameters after adjusting for the effect of confounding factors through logistic regression. Our systematic review identified 110 studies from 15 countries accounting for 3,057,428 participants (35% female, median age 50 years). The pooled proportion of HTG-AP was 11.6% globally while the Eastern and Western countries reported the proportions as 16.3% and 5.4%, respectively (P<0.01). The pooled mortality rate was remarkably higher in Eastern countries (4.1%) than in Western countries (1.0%) (P<0.01). 3,224 participants (37% female, median age 48 years) were included in our multi-center cohort study, and the proportion of HTG-AP was much higher at 35.9% with a nearly three-fold higher mortality rate compared with acute pancreatitis (AP) due to other etiologies (odds ratio (OR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60 to 4.81). The proportion of patients with HTG-AP is remarkably higher in Eastern countries, particularly China, than in Western countries. Furthermore, compared with other causes of AP, HTG-AP has a poorer prognosis and may warrant aggressive management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it