Patients with HFpEF who exhibit impaired sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness have a blunted exercise hyperemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown a reduced blood flow response to exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This research has primarily focused on an impairment in the capacity to vasodilate during exercise. However, the ability to vasoconstrict is also vital for blood flow redistribution during exercise. This is important because patients with HFpEF have been shown to exhibit reduced alpha-adrenergic responsiveness. Notably, there is considerable heterogeneity in the level to which peripheral vasodilation and vasoconstriction are blunted among patients with HFpEF. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that those patients with HFpEF who are unable to vasoconstrict to sympatho-excitation (i.e., a cold pressor test, CPT) would have a reduced leg blood flow response to single leg knee extensor (SLKE) exercise than those patients with HFpEF who are able to vasoconstrict. Methods: Forty-three patients diagnosed with HFpEF (29 females; Age: 70 ± 7 years; body mass index: 39 ± 7 kg/m 2 ) were instrumented to measure heart rate (ECG), beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP; finger photoplethysmography), common femoral artery blood flow (duplex Doppler ultrasound), and brachial BP (sphygmomanometry). Participants sat upright on a SLKE ergometer while data were recorded during 3 minutes of quiet rest, followed by a 2-minute CPT. Next, after a 15-minute break, 3 minutes of SLKE exercise was performed at 46 ± 13% of peak SLKE watts (i.e., 7 ± 1 watts). Leg blood flow was calculated (LBF = common femoral artery radius 2 X mean blood velocity X 60) and used to determine leg vascular conductance (LVC; LBF/mean arterial BP). Patients with HFpEF were divided into those who didn’t have a decrease in LVC (non-constrictors: +26 ± 24 %ΔLVC; n = 22) and those who did have a decrease in LVC (constrictors: -15 ± 14 %ΔLVC; n = 21; P < 0.001) in response to the CPT. Results: Resting heart rate, resting BP, peak SLKE watts and lean thigh mass (DEXA) were not different between groups (all P > 0.48). The change in heart rate and BP during the CPT and SLKE exercise was also not different between groups (all P > 0.20). Non-constrictors had lower resting LBF (non-constrictors: 276 ± 128 ml/min; constrictors: 421 ± 200 ml/min; P = 0.006) and LVC (non-constrictors: 3.1 ± 1.5 ml/min/mmHg; constrictors: 4.7 ± 2.3 ml/min/mmHg; P = 0.008) compared to constrictors. In response to the SLKE exercise non-constrictors had a smaller increase in LBF (non-constrictors: Δ 1139 ± 425 ml/min; constrictors: Δ 1497 ± 454 ml/min; P = 0.011) and LVC (non-constrictors: Δ 9.8 ± 3.4 ml/min/mmHg; constrictors: Δ 13.3 ± 4.5 ml/min/mmHg; P = 0.007) compared to constrictors. Conclusion: In summary, patients with HFpEF who are not able to mount a vasoconstrictor response to a CPT present with a reduced blood flow response to exercise. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (1P01HL137630). This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".