Impact of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive impairment in elderly individuals with hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Older adults frequently experience vitamin D deficiency, which has been linked to both cognitive decline and hypertension. However, evidence on whether correcting vitamin D insufficiency can improve recognition memory and blood pressure (BP) control in this population remains inconclusive. Objective To evaluate the association between vitamin D supplementation and improvements in cognitive function and BP among older adults with hypertension and mild cognitive deficits. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patient records from individuals aged ≥65 years who had documented hypertension, baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels < 30 ng/mL, and mild cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] < 26) or subjective cognitive complaints. Patients were categorized into two groups based on recorded vitamin D supplementation (≥5,000 IU/day for ≥6 months vs. no or minimal supplementation). Recognition memory, global cognition (MoCA), systolic and diastolic BP, and serum 25(OH)D levels were compared between groups. Results Among 153 eligible records, those in the Supplemented group showed greater gains in recognition memory (+3.1 ± 2.4 vs. +1.2 ± 2.0 points; p = 0.01) and a larger decrease in systolic BP (−12.8 ± 7.2 vs. −7.1 ± 6.8 mmHg; p = 0.03). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these benefits. For instance, in adjusted multivariable regression, recognition memory improved by an additional +1.8 points (95% CI 0.9–2.7; p = 0.002) and systolic BP fell by −10.7 mmHg (p = 0.01) in the Supplemented group. Multivariable regression and propensity-score-matched analyses yielded comparable cognitive and blood-pressure benefits. Stratified analyses indicated stronger responses in those with MoCA < 22 (+2.9 points in recognition memory; p = 0.01) and in participants with baseline 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL (+2.8 points; p = 0.003). Both men and women derived similar cognitive and BP benefits. Mild hypercalcemia occurred in 3.8% of supplemented patients vs. 1.3% of comparisons. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort, vitamin D supplementation was associated with notable improvements in recognition memory, global cognition, and systolic BP among older adults with hypertension and mild cognitive deficits. These findings highlight the potential clinical benefits of correcting vitamin D insufficiency in this high-risk population, warranting further investigation in prospective trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".