MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411550952 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3582063

Retraction Notice: A DQN-Based Frame Aggregation and Task Offloading Approach for Edge-Enabled IoMT

2025· article· en· W4411550952 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Yuan, Zedan Zhang, Chujun Feng, Yejia Cui, Sahil Garg, Georges Kaddoum, Keping Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoticeTask (project management)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingFrame (networking)Distributed computingComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid expansion of wearable medical devices and health data of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) poses new challenges to the high Quality of Service (QoS) of intelligent health care in the foreseeable 6 G era. Healthcare applications and services require ultra reliable, ultra low delay and energy consumption data communication and computing. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) technologies empowered IoMT to deal with huge data sensing, processing and transmission in high QoS. However, traditional frame aggregation schemes in WBAN generate too much control frames during data transmission, which leads to high delay and energy consumption and is not flexible enough. In this paper, a Deep Q-learning Network (DQN) based Frame Aggregation and Task Offloading Approach (DQN-FATOA) is proposed. Firstly, different service data were divided into queues with similar QoS requirements. Then, the length of the frame aggregation was selected dynamically by the aggregation node according to the delay, energy consumption, and throughput by DQN. Finally, the number of tasks offloaded was selected due to the current state. Compared with the traditional scheme, the simulation results show that the proposed DQN-FATOA has effectively reduced delay and energy consumption, and improved the throughput and overall utilization of WBAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaResearch integrity
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablemedium
gptResearch integrity
Domain: not available · Genre: Editorial
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther · Editorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCategoryResearch integrityFrench-language works237,207