MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411555799 · doi:10.3103/s014587522570019x

The Age Distribution Pattern of Precambrian Detrital Zircons in the Section of the Yuryuzan–Sylva Depression of the Cis-Uralian Foredeep Based on U–Pb LA-ICP-MS Isotope Dating: Single Source Demolition Indicator

2025· article· en· W4411555799 on OpenAlexaff
E. A. Volodina, A. V. Tevelev, A. A. BORISENKO, Egor Koptev

Bibliographic record

VenueMoscow University Geology Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPrecambrianSection (typography)IsotopeGeochemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Yuryuzan–Sylva Depression, а part of the Cis-Uralian Foredeep, is filled with flysch-molasse complexes dated to the interval from the Moscovian Stage of the Middle Carboniferous to the Artinskian Stage of the Lower Permian. Nine samples for geochronological studies were collected from different levels of the section for extraction and the subsequent dating of detrital zircons. The distribution of Precambrian zircons in the total zircon population is of particular interest. The proportion of Precambrian zircons generally decreases from 97 to 4% from bottom to top. At the same time, the age distribution spectra of these zircons are similar throughout the section, suggesting a single source for them. In addition, these spectra are similar to those of zircons from the Vendian Asha Group of the Bashkir Megazone, which, apparently, was the source of Precambrian zircons for the Upper Paleozoic formations of the Yuryuzan–Sylva depression. The Riphean rift-related complexes of the Bashkir Megazone and the Archean–Early Proterozoic complexes of the Taratash high were not included in this provenance area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoscow University Geology BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207