Hubungan Social Support dengan Quarter Life Crisis pada Mahasiswa Akhir Universitas Negeri Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a phenomenon that can occur in individuals in their 20s who experience a major transition in life, from the world of education to the world of work. This crisis arises due to extraordinary uncertainty about the future, confusion about the direction of life, and feelings of helplessness because there are too many choices available. Good social support from the environment such as emotiona/ appreciation support, material, information and companionship will help final year students experience the quarter life crisis phase. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between social support and quarter life crisis in final year students at Padang State University. This type of research is quantitative research with a research sample of 292 final year students using probability sampling techniques, namely cluster sampling techniques in determining the sample. The instruments used were the quarter life crisis questionnaire and the social support questionnaire. The results of the statistical analysis test of the study showed that if the significance value was 0.000 (p <0.05) it meant that the research hypothesis was accepted. There is a significant relationship between social support and quarter life crisis in final year students at Padang State University with a correlation value of -.615, this relationship is in the strong correlation category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".