MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411570520 · doi:10.3390/nu17132074

Effects of Creatine and β-Alanine Co-Supplementation on Exercise Performance and Body Composition: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4411570520 on OpenAlexaff
Damoon Ashtary‐Larky, Darren G. Candow, Scott C. Forbes, Leila Hajizadeh, José António, Katsuhiko Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrients · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiochemical effects in animals
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatineMedicineAerobic exerciseCreatine MonohydratePlaceboInternal medicineAnaerobic exerciseMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialIngestionPhysical therapyExercise physiologyAlanineEndocrinologyChemistryBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Creatine and β-alanine are two widely used dietary supplements known to enhance exercise performance and improve body composition; however, less is known regarding the synergistic effects of combining the two supplements. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 2025. Eligible studies included adult participants receiving creatine and β-alanine together compared to creatine or β-alanine alone for at least four weeks and assessed measures of exercise performance and/or body composition. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (n = 263 participants; 231 males and 32 females) met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, the combination of creatine and β-alanine supplementation enhanced high-intensity exercise performance, particularly anaerobic power and repeated-bout performance, compared to creatine or β-alanine alone. Co-ingestion of creatine and β-alanine supplementation did not increase measures of maximal strength compared to creatine alone. The effects of creatine and β-alanine supplementation on body composition were equivocal, with one study reporting greater lean mass gains and fat mass reductions compared to creatine and β-alanine supplementation individually, while another found no significant improvements. Additionally, no significant improvements in aerobic endurance capacity (VO2max, lactate threshold, or time to exhaustion) were observed from creatine and β-alanine supplementation co-ingestion. Conclusions: The combination of creatine and β-alanine supplementation may be effective for enhancing high-intensity exercise performance but has no greater effect on maximal strength, body composition, or measures of aerobic capacity compared to creatine or β-alanine alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.009
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrientsSame topicBiochemical effects in animalsFrench-language works237,207