MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411577571 · doi:10.1111/ibi.13425

Artificial light alters spatial and temporal habitat use by a crepuscular aerial insectivore

2025· article· en· W4411577571 on OpenAlex
Carrie Ann Adams, Colleen Cassady St. Clair, Elly C. Knight, Erin M. Bayne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIbis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicImpact of Light on Environment and Health
Canadian institutionsAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Conservation Association
KeywordsCrepuscularInsectivoreHabitatGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial light is increasing worldwide, and has biological effects from molecular to ecosystem levels, which may be particularly severe for crepuscular and nocturnal animals. We investigated how artificial light affected spatial and temporal patterns of habitat use by Common Nighthawks Chordeiles minor in the southern Grassland and northern Boreal regions of Alberta, Canada. We measured two types of artificial light: upward radiance (light emitted directly from ground sources towards space) and skyglow (light scattered back towards Earth). Nighthawks potentially benefit from hunting aerial insects that aggregate near light sources and using skyglow to see their prey, but they may suffer increased predation risk at their cryptic ground nests if artificial light increases their visibility. We predicted a negative association with artificial light for territorial habitat use (where nighthawks are probably nesting) and a positive association for extra‐territorial habitat use (where they are probably foraging). We recorded the different sounds made by nighthawks that reveal when they are defending a breeding territory and then measured the intensity of territorial and extra‐territorial habitat use at 514 acoustic recording stations. Where nighthawks were present in more than 5% of recordings, we also determined associations between diel patterns of vocal activity and artificial light, measured via sun angle. We found a negative association with artificial light for both territorial and extra‐territorial spatial patterns of habitat use in the Grassland, but not in the Boreal. Similarly, we found no effect of artificial light on temporal patterns of habitat use in the Boreal, whereas the morning activity peak in the Grassland occurred earlier at sites with skyglow when cloud cover was high. Our other measurement of artificial light – upward radiance – had no effect on temporal patterns of habitat use in either region, indicating that artificial light did not extend the foraging activity period of nighthawks. Our results may generalize to other crepuscular species, suggesting that artificial light is more likely to affect habitat use during the breeding season at lower latitudes where natural illumination is lower during twilight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it