MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411580382 · doi:10.3390/insects16070655

Antennal Sensilla Morphology and Flagellomere Addition in Nymphs and Adults of Hierodula patellifera Serville, 1839 (Mantodea: Mantidae)

2025· article· en· W4411580382 on OpenAlexaff
Huan Wang, Yang Wang, Yang Liu, Geer Teni, Huiwen Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInsects · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyNymphZoologyMorphology (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hierodula patellifera Serville is a predatory insect widely distributed in Asia. To better understand the morphology of the antennae of mantids, the antennal morphology, structure, and distribution of sensilla in nymphs and adults of H. patellifera were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The antennal morphology of nymphs and adults was similar and consisted of the scape, pedicel, and flagellum. Seven types and four subtypes of sensilla were identified (sensilla trichodea: StI, StII; sensilla basiconica: Sb; sensilla chaetica: Sc; sensilla coelocapitula: Sco; sensilla campaniformia: ScaI, ScaII; grooved peg sensilla: Sgp; Böhm’s bristle: Bb), and an undefined cuticular structure was observed in nymphs. Based on the external morphology and distributional features of the sensilla, we proposed to divide the adult flagellum into six parts. Furthermore, the length of the antennae gradually increased with the growth of instars, and the most obvious individual growth of antennae occurred from the 5th- to 6th-instar nymphs; sexual dimorphism in antennal length width, and sensilla distribution becomes evident from the 7th instar, and compared to adult females, the adult males presented larger flagellomeres and a large number of grooved peg sensilla. We found that mantid antennae develop through the addition of new flagellomeres at their proximal and secondary division sections, and the similarities and differences were compared with other insects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsectsSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207