Protective Effect of Syringic Acid Against Cadmium-Induced Testicular Toxicity in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examined the effects of syringic acid (SA) against testicular toxicity induced by cadmium (CAD). In the study, once daily for 7 days, the control and CAD groups were administered sterile distilled water, while the CAD + SA and SA groups were administered 25 mg/kg SA. Additionally, on the first day of the study, saline solution was administered intraperitoneally to the control and SA groups, and 1.5 mg/kg CdCl 2 was administered intraperitoneally to the CAD and CAD + SA groups. In blood, serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) enzyme activity, testosterone, creatine, and urea levels were evaluated. Spermatological parameters, including sperm motility, sperm viability, sperm concentration, and abnormal sperm, were evaluated. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemical analysis (inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclin D1, cannabinoid receptor1 (CB1)) were performed on testicular tissue. The testosterone value of the CAD group was significantly lower compared to the control and SA groups ( p < 0.0083). In the CAD + SA group, sperm motility, sperm vitality, and sperm concentration were significantly increased compared to the CAD group. In contrast, the percentages of abnormal sperm (head and tail) were significantly decreased in the CAD + SA group compared to the CAD group ( p < 0.0083). The rate of iNOS positivity in the SA and CAD + SA groups was similar to those in the control group. However, iNOS positivity was significantly higher in the testicles of the CAD group compared to the remaining groups ( p < 0.0083). In conclusion, SA can be used as a preventative agent against testicular toxicity caused by CAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".