MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411592994 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.18.660287

Expert drummers replicate neuromechanical signatures of physiological tremor at extreme movement frequencies

2025· preprint· en· W4411592994 on OpenAlexaff
Aurélie Sarcher, Sylvain Dorel, Nadia R. Azar, R. Bal, Thomas Cattagni, Antoine Nordez

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReplicateMovement (music)Physical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceSpeech recognitionStatisticsAcousticsMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigates the neuromechanical characteristics associated with expert drummers’ ability to achieve unilateral ankle oscillation frequencies of up to 10 Hz, surpassing known limits for lower-body movements. Eighteen experienced drummers performed trials at various frequencies, using a protocol combining H-reflex measurement, motion analysis, and electromyography. Our findings closely parallel neuromechanical signatures observed in ankle tremors, with an average movement frequency of 6.3 Hz (SD: 0.5 Hz), and a modulation range of 5.5–7.3 Hz. Oscillatory behavior may result from the interplay between muscle-tendon mechanics and stretch reflex loops. At 6.3 Hz, soleus activation lasts 56.2 ms, shortening by 2.5 ms/Hz (p < 0.001), while tibialis anterior activation lasts 52.7 ms, decreasing by 5.3 ms/Hz (p < 0.001). The latency between ankle dorsiflexion and soleus activation is 48.5 ms at 6.3 Hz, matching the short-latency stretch reflex, and decreases by 11 ms/Hz (p<0.001). Limiting factors for the drummer’s maximal frequency are soleus and tibialis anterior co-activation, reducing ankle movement, and high levels of activation in hip and back muscles, associated with discomfort and pain. Drummers with higher maximal frequencies (above 7.5 Hz, n = 6) show shorter tibialis anterior activation durations (34.3 ms vs. 53.2 ms, p = 0.0013) and reduced tensor fascia latae activation (6.2% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.0135). These findings highlight phenomenological similarities between the ankle technique and physiological tremors, in terms of neuromechanical timing and oscillatory patterns. Precise tibialis anterior timing and relaxed proximal muscle activation are critical for performance, while injury prevention strategies remain essential. Significance Statement This study provides a neuromechanical analysis of expert metal drummers producing exceptionally high-frequency ankle movements—up to 10 Hz—that surpass known limits for lower-body movements, and draws parallels with physiological action tremors. By comparing their motor patterns to those reported in tremor literature, this work highlights the role of neuromuscular timing and mechanical adaptations, such as stretch reflex dynamics and muscle-tendon interactions. The findings demonstrate that precise tibialis anterior timing and relaxed proximal muscles are critical for performance, while stabilization demands increase the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the lower back and hips. These insights bridge performance science, biomechanics, and injury prevention, offering valuable perspectives for optimizing high-frequency movements in music, sports, and rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→