MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mitochondrio - a Unity platform-based simulation of mitochondrial network dynamics

2025· article· en· W4411594682 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeffrey A. Stuart, Ben Wiebe, Rodrigo Vega Jimenez

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsNiagara CollegeBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)Computer scienceBiologyComputational biologyBiological systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondria can take on a wide range of forms, from spherical/ovoid structures to tubules to highly interconnected networks. In many cell types, mitochondria are highly malleable, capable of continually undergoing fusion and/or fission to form larger or smaller structures, respectively. In addition, mitochondria are motile, trafficked along the cytoskeleton by molecular motors to reach distant parts of the cell and then return. Computational biology can be usefully applied to understanding dynamical systems, sometimes revealing underlying relationships that are not otherwise apparent. For this purpose we developed Mitochondrio, an application that simulates mitochondrial network dynamics in a single cell. Mitochondrio is programmed in Unity, a platform specializing in creating 3D games. The application presents the user with an interface allowing them to enter parameter values for the following mitochondrial characteristics: starting density, fusion probability, fission probability, and speed. The user also defines a starting cytoskeleton, as mitochondria are tethered in silico to this cytoskeleton. When a simulation is then initiated, Mitochondrio will run continually under the specific parameters and eventually reach a steady state that can be analyzed by other platforms like MiNA. Here we will describe the development of Mitochondrio and its use to gain insight into mitochondrial dynamics that can inform experimental work. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207