MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411600798 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2025.3582121

Retraction Notice A Hybrid Multistage DNN-Based Collaborative IDPS for High-Risk Smart Factory Networks

2025· article· en· W4411600798 on OpenAlexaff
Poulmanogo Illy, Georges Kaddoum, Paulo Freitas de Araujo-Filho, Kuljeet Kaur, Sahil Garg

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvanced Computing and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeComputer scienceFactory (object-oriented programming)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New industrial control systems (ICSs) that have been modernized with the industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) are exposed to cyber-attacks that exploit IIoT vulnerabilities. Numerous intrusion detection systems (IDSs) have therefore been proposed to secure ICSs, many of which are based on machine learning, specifically deep neural networks (DNNs). Most of the proposed DNN-based solutions rely on single deep learning models and could be less costly in terms of ICS latency. However, they might have difficulties understanding the increasingly complex data distribution of intrusion patterns. Moreover, single deep learning models may not be effective in capturing the specific patterns of minority classes in highly imbalanced datasets, which is usually the case in cyber-security. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel hybrid multistage DNN-based intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) with better accuracy for critical ICSs that cannot afford to compromise on security to improve latency. The proposed approach sequentially learns the decision boundaries of the data that were misclassified or classified with low confidence by previous DNNs. Moreover, it incorporates a collaborative intrusion prevention system (IPS) with an emergency response schema that automatically mitigates attacks as soon as anomalies are detected. The results of experimental evaluations performed on different datasets demonstrate the effectiveness ofthe proposed solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicAdvanced Computing and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207