MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411604425 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101056

Pretransplant Serum Creatinine in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Predicts Graft Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4411604425 on OpenAlexafffund
Faisal Jarrar, Karthik Tennankore, Ngan N. Lam, David A. Clark, Bryce Kiberd, Amanda J. Vinson

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisCreatinineMedicineUrologyDialysisInternal medicineRenal transplantIntensive care medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective: Although peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a pretransplant dialysis modality is associated with favorable outcomes after kidney transplant, it is unknown if pretransplant serum creatinine (Scr) level is associated with subsequent graft outcomes in candidates managed with PD. Our objective was to examine the association between Scr at the time of transplant and short-term and long-term outcomes posttransplant. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: A total of 20,166 adult (≥18 years of age) patients who were receiving PD at the time of a first living or deceased donor kidney transplant in the United States between 2000 and 2017, identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Exposures: Primary exposure was final Scr level before transplant, categorized as <5, 5-8, 8-12, and >12 mg/dL. Sensitivity analyses for patient subgroups included recipient age (≥50 vs <50 years) and dialysis vintage (≥3 vs <3 years) at transplant. Outcomes: The primary outcome was death-censored graft loss (DCGL). Secondary outcomes included all-cause graft loss and delayed graft function (DGF). Results: Pretransplant Scr was significantly associated with DCGL (adjusted HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34 for Scr >12 mg/dL [reference <5 mg/dL]) and DGF (adjusted OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.26-3.26 for Scr >12 mg/dL [reference <5 mg/dL]). There was no association with all-cause graft loss. The risk of DCGL and DGF associated with high pretransplant Scr was higher for those who were older (≥50 years) and those with longer dialysis vintage (≥3 years). Limitations: No access to potential predictors of pretransplant Scr including residual kidney function, dialysis adequacy and adherence; exact timing of Scr values pretransplant was unknown. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the association between pretransplant Scr level in PD patients and graft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The reason for this increased risk is unclear but may reflect reduced residual kidney function, among other factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207