MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411605636 · doi:10.1002/ijc.70017

Pulmonary toxicity in children, adolescents, and young adults with testicular germ cell tumors: A population‐based retrospective matched cohort study

2025· article· en· W4411605636 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rand Ajaj, Andrea S. Gershon, Cindy Lau, Sumit Gupta, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Jason D. Pole, Furqan Shaikh, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CarePediatric Oncology Group of Ontario
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeHazard ratioPopulationPulmonary embolismInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsTesticular cancerCumulative incidenceChemotherapyCohortConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are highly curable, survivors experience toxicities. Pulmonary outcomes post-TGCT are not well understood, particularly among children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). Using provincial cancer registries, we identified all CAYA (aged 11-21 years) diagnosed with a TGCT from 1992 to 2021 in Ontario, Canada, and matched them (1:5) to general population males (controls). We linked CAYA to health administrative databases to identify pulmonary disease and pulmonary disease healthcare visits (PDV) and classified PDV severity as low (outpatient family physician/pediatrician), medium (outpatient respirologist/internist), or high (hospitalization/emergency department). We assessed acute (<5 years from diagnosis) and late (≥5 years after diagnosis) toxicities using the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific hazard models. We identified 748 patients (404 chemotherapy-treated) and 3740 controls. Patients' median age at diagnosis was 19.0 years [interquartile range (IQR):18.0-21.0] and 29.7 years (IQR:25.0-37.6) at end of follow-up. Non-chemotherapy-treated patients had higher risk of acute toxicities (obstructive lung disease, medium severity PDV, hospitalizations) but similar risk of late toxicities to controls. Chemotherapy-treated patients had higher risk than controls of most acute pulmonary toxicities (except asthma and low severity PDV) and several late toxicities: asthma [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.0, 95%CI:1.1-3.8], pulmonary embolism/infarction (HR = 7.3, 95%CI:1.2-44.3), medium severity PDV (HR = 3.9, 95%CI:2.1-7.3), and high severity PDV (HR = 1.7, 95%CI:1.0-2.8), particularly hospitalizations (HR = 4.1, 95%CI:1.7-9.5). CAYA TGCT survivors treated with chemotherapy are at risk for late asthma, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary fibrosis, and specialist and hospital-based pulmonary care. Further follow-up is needed to characterize late pulmonary outcomes as survivors age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CancerSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207