MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411609321 · doi:10.3390/w17131869

Dynamics of Wetlands in Ifrane National Park, Morocco: An Approach Using Satellite Imagery and Spectral Indices

2025· article· en· W4411609321 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachid Addou, Najat Bhiry, Hassan Achiban

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsWetlandSatellite imageryRemote sensingSatelliteNational parkGeographyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementPhysical geographyEcologyArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study aims to analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics of six lakes in Ifrane National Park (Morocco) using remote sensing and satellite imagery over the period 2000–2024. Spectral indices such as NDWI, MNDWI, EWI, AWEI, and ANDWI were employed to extract water bodies from Landsat images, while the NDVI index was used to identify irrigated agricultural lands. Additionally, the SPEI and RDI indices were applied to assess the impact of climate fluctuations on the hydrological evolution of the lakes. The results reveal an alarming reduction in lake surface areas, with some lakes having completely dried up. This decline is correlated with decreased precipitation and the expansion of irrigated agricultural lands, highlighting the impact of human activities. The analysis of hydrological correlations between lakes demonstrates significant interactions, although some indices show disparities. The rapid expansion of agricultural land, particularly arboriculture, increases pressure on water resources. These changes threaten local biodiversity and heighten the socio-economic vulnerability of surrounding populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaterSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207