Caring for loved ones as community: Supporting caregivers of Native Hawaiians living with dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caregiving interventions can reduce caregiver burden and promote caregiver competence, yet caregiving is rooted in culture, with differing impacts of the caregiving role. Culturally adapted interventions may better address the unique experiences of diverse family caregivers. In this exploratory study, we aimed to adapt the Savvy Caregiver Program (SCP), an evidence-based caregiving intervention, with a Native Hawaiian community in Hawaiʻi. First, a community action board (CAB) and research team tailored the curriculum to include Hawaiian values, language, proverbs and examples while maintaining the program core components. Then, Native Hawaiian adults participated in the preliminary adapted program, ʻAuamo Kuleana O Nā Maʻi Poina (ʻAuamo Kuleana). We describe the experiences of caregiving for a Native Hawaiian adult living with ADRD and how we obtained feedback to refine ‘Auamo Kuleana prior to pilot testing. Individuals who participated in the 7-week session of ʻAuamo Kuleana ( N = 6) were asked to complete a survey and a focus group or interview to share their experiences and provide feedback that informed a process evaluation of the program. The CAB and research team analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis. Only one participant was actively providing care; the other five participants were interested in proactive training to support their community. Caring as a community was a common theme. Participants shared positive feedback about ʻAuamo Kuleana and participants appreciated the tailored content. As such, no changes were made to the program. Two suggestions were identified: include all family members in the program to be in alignment as a ʻohana (family) in providing care and add information about planning for their own care. Future Native Hawaiian-focused caregiving interventions should consider incorporating cultural practices and values, proactive training about dementia and caregiving, caring as a community, and family-centered (rather than dyadic) caregiving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".