Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable architecturewas introduced several decades agoand many solutions have been presented for it and the contemporary crisis.However, there are still problems in the way of sustainable development.The formation of civilization is very gradual issue and it should have its particular process.In addition, civilizations need to have a strong intellectual base and principles.Thus, we should have a different look to the cultural heritage in each countryas examples of art and civilization.Vernacular architecture is an interconnectedseries,which has achieved appropriate solutions in dealing with environmental, cultural, economic, and qualityproblemsin different periods and through trial and error.Therefore, we accept that the entire architecture is a sequence.This sequence is able to provide an opportunity for a type of architecture with the new conditions.Thus, we will realize that vernacular architecturewill achieve new solutionsfor coping with other issues.It not only improves the quality of life and protects the resources, but also will be a reflection of a certain pattern of life.Sustainability means creating a repeatable processand it is a concept that is usedmostly as a value.With this approach,understanding the repeatable principles and values ofvernacular architectureis very valuable and desired.In this paper, the research method is based on library studies, literature review, and analysis with descriptive approach.Initially, vernacular architecture and its fields were defined and then, their impact on sustainable development was discussed.Results indicate that the vernacular architecturehas characteristics that are consistent with sustainable development goals, which lead to understanding the role of vernacular architecture in creating the approach of sustainability in architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.896 | 0.877 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".