Bibliographic record
Abstract
Participatory Technology Development (PTD) project was one of the elements of the comprehensive management plan of Honam watershed that was performed in collaboration with ICARDA 1 to improve the livelihood resilience of poor farmers in the Honam watershed area.The purpose of this study was to analyze factors affecting success of Participatory Technology Development (PTD) project in Honam watershed of Lorestan province.This study was conducted as a survey research.Statistical population consists of187 farmers in the project which126 people of them were chosen as statistical samples through simple random sampling; and finally 114 questionnaires were collected and analyzed.In experts' section of theproject, 78 people were selected through census and eventually, 67 questionnaires were collected.Face and content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by six professors in agricultural college of Tehran University and Tarbiat Modares University; and its reliability was between 0.87-0.91.The results showed that the factors in farmers' section included four factors of "individual-technical empowerment", "effective communication with farmers", "self-esteem", and "consideration of indigenous knowledge and experiences" which generally explained 69.52% ofthe total variance of the factors; as well as the results of experts' section suggested that four factors of "the improvement of participatory communications", "emphasis on participatory learning development in different stages", "indigenous knowledge", and "changing the role of individuals in the project" explained 61.67% of the total variance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.978 | 0.961 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".