MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618146 · doi:10.51847/6bfrd8veqf

10.51847/6bFRd8vEqf

2000· article· en· W4411618146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPrivate Equity and Venture Capital
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractCommodityAgricultureBusinessContract farmingEconomicsCommerceNatural resource economicsFinanceMicroeconomicsProduction (economics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The background of organized commodity exchanges dates back to the 17th century when grain merchants in Japan stored rice in warehouses for future use.The concept propounds that futures contract should have a good contract design in order to enhance performance of the commodity exchange.However, there is no consensus on the importance of contract specifications on commodity exchange.The increasing role of the agricultural commodity exchange and financial sector, on both economic development and poverty alleviation, has seen the concept being applied more on the financial sector than before; this has been further aggravated by world financial crisis, hunger and its consequences.In this regard, Zimbabwe is no exception, by the year 2002, the Zimbabwe Agricultural Commodity Exchange ceased to operate due to number of issues; but chief among them has been cited as poor contract specifications.The paper presents the findings of the study that was conducted to determine the futures contract specifications that would make Zimbabwe agricultural commodity exchange thrive again.It applies both primary and secondary data in gathering the necessary information, to assess the causal relationship between contract design and exchange market (Price quotations, trading system, trading hours, contract sizes, delivery days and exchange fees).The study extended the knowledge of commodity and financial sectors to the stakeholders.The research was motivated by the fact that, most nascent commodity exchanges.The study showed that contract design affect commodity exchange; poor contract design would cause the business activities, to "shut doors.Field research was beneficial to obtain an in-depth understanding of the contract designs from local experts in the commodities markets.Therefore, in order to improve commodity exchange, good contract designs must be implemented, this includes improving trading system, trading hours, contract sizes.On the hand, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe should ensure or put in place robust supervisory and regulatory policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9710.965

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicPrivate Equity and Venture CapitalFrench-language works237,207