Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundSeparation Anxiety in children is a disorder with negative impacts on social harmony and relationships with peers.Without proper treatment, it may, over time, lead to other anxiety disorders or negative performances in various aspects in adulthood.It is associated with many problems and, therefore, the identification of effective treatment for this disorder, including Child -Parent Relationship Training (CPRT) to alleviate separation anxiety in children was the purpose of this research.Methods This was an experimental study with pre-test, post-test and follow-ups (2 and 3 months) along with a control group.Using multi-stage cluster sampling, 388 children was selected from pre-school and first grade levels in the city of Qom (Iran).After screening, 76 children showed symptoms of separation anxiety disorder; from them, 31 children were selected randomly and divided into experimental and control groups.The experimental group received CPRT, individually; while the control group received no intervention."Child Symptom Inventory" was used to collect data in four stages: pre-test, post-test and two follow-ups (2 and 3 months).Analysis of variance with repeated measurements test applied to data.Results statistical tests showed significant difference between control and experimental groups.In addition, the results showed that the variables of time and interaction between treatment, gender and age were statistically significant (α=0.05).Also, the 2-and 3-months treatment period showed significant reduction in separation anxiety in children.Conclusions In general, the results of the present study confirm the effectiveness of CPRT in reducing symptoms of separation anxiety in children of both sexes aged 6-7 years.With respect to the effectiveness of CPRT, the use of this protocol is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.968 | 0.950 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".