Bibliographic record
Abstract
Debate on the family and the ways for its strengthening are one of the most common discussions in the world's scientific community and satisfactory sexual intercourse among spouses is one of the most important factors in consolidating the stability of families.Therefore, this research was carried out with the aim to determine the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral sex education on women's life quality in Yazd emphasizing on the family and women who play a significant role in the community education.This was a semi-experimental research with pre-test, post-test design which was conducted on experimental and control groups.The statistical population of the study included all the women referring to the centers for the consolidation of the family foundation in Yazd during 2015-2016.They were placed to experimental group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20) in a simple random method.The measurement tool was Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).Intervention after pre-test was conducted over 6 two-hour sessions and in groups, and posttest was taken from both experimental and control groups after the stage of educational intervention.Data were analyzed using SPSS software and statistical analysis of covariance analysis.The results of the test showed that cognitive-behavioral sex education was effective on women's quality of life and, the scores of women's quality of life increased at the post-test stage.Therefore, the result can be used in preventing sexual problems, changing a positive attitude towards spouses' sexual intercourse and improving marital relationships in educational centers, family counseling, as well as the judiciary, education, and other organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.996 | 0.997 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".