MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618391 · doi:10.51847/uzwrsqocan

10.51847/uZwRsqocAn

2000· article· en· W4411618391 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Education, and Development Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalitySustainable developmentBusinessPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the literature on entrepreneurship and those who make good entrepreneurs, empirical support is divided on whether personality profile of an entrepreneur should be established and whether such profile can hold its ground given that entrepreneurial abilities and aptitude as well as business success are both affected by environmental factors.Regardless of this debate, scholars have been consistent in empirically validating the link between certain personality traits and entrepreneurship abilities, business creation and business success as well as ability to benefit from entrepreneurship training.Furthermore, entrepreneurial abilities of people in a nation have been equally traced to increased economic growth and technological advancement as well as the competitive advantage of such a nation in the world economy.Given the above reasons, it was the position of this study, that the precarious economic situation of the country presently and the resulting solutions centered around wealth generation through encouraging entrepreneurship activities in the Nigerian populace should also take into consideration personality testing in order to clearly identify those who can benefit from entrepreneurship endeavours and training.This study therefore sets to extend the literature on the personality profile of the entrepreneur bringing evidence from Nigeria.Achievement motivation defined as "behaviour towards competition with a standard of excellence" (McClelland, 1953) emerged as one of the personality traits that have been consistently linked to entrepreneurship and business success; the study therefore compared entrepreneur and non-entrepreneur on this trait.A total of 96 (48 entrepreneurs and 48 salary-paid workers) participants selected through convenience sampling responded to Herman's (1970) nine dimensions of Achievement Motivation Questionnaire adapted by Eyo (1986).The result of t-test comparison showed entrepreneurs to be higher in global achievement motivation than non-entrepreneurs.Comparison on each of the nine dimensions only yielded significance for four of the nine dimensions which were achievement behaviour, persistence, task tension and time perspective.Female entrepreneurs also had higher aspiration level than male entrepreneurs.The implication of this findings were discussed in relation to fostering entrepreneurship in Nigeria for sustainable development and international competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9070.897

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGender, Education, and Development IssuesFrench-language works237,207