MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618820 · doi:10.1007/s10067-025-07539-0

Identifying clinically relevant subgroups of patients with knee pain flares for ibuprofen treatment: a secondary analysis

2025· article· en· W4411618820 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
R.U. Sharma, J. Runhaar, P.K. Bos, Desirée M. J. Dorleijn, Patrick Bindels, Sita Bierma‐Zeinstra

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDutch Arthritis AssociationZonMwArthritis SocietyDutch Arthritis Society
KeywordsMedicineIbuprofenRheumatologyInternal medicinePhysical therapyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether subgroups with more severe inflammatory symptoms during a knee pain flare benefited more from a high dose ibuprofen treatment than subgroups with less severe inflammatory symptoms. METHODS: This secondary analysis included adults with ≥ 1 flares of knee pain in the last year, who experienced a new episode within 24 h and randomized into two treatment groups of daily ibuprofen 1200 mg or 2400 mg for 5 days. A multilevel regression analysis was used to assess interaction effects between intervention groups and pre-defined subgroups, based on osteoarthritis related symptoms (severity of morning stiffness, swelling, and pain). The primary outcome was the difference in treatment effect between subgroups on pain severity (0-10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS)) after 5 days. Differences in treatment effect between subgroups after 3 days (NRS) and 5 days (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scale) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Participants (N = 308) had a mean age of 52.4 ± 12.9 (SD) years with 41% female subjects. No significant interaction was found between the pre-defined subgroups and intervention groups on pain severity after day 5 (all p-values ≥ 0.28) or on the secondary outcomes (all p-values ≥ 0.38). Given the potential lack of power, the absolute and adjusted mean differences between treatment arms were compared for each subgroup; none of the differences reached clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Between subgroups with more and less severe inflammatory symptoms during knee pain flares, no significant nor clinical benefit was found from a higher dose of ibuprofen compared to a lower dose. Keypoints • Despite the overall superiority of the higher dose, patients with severe inflammatory knee symptoms do not benefit more from an anti-inflammatory dose of ibuprofen than patients with less severe symptoms. • A higher dose of ibuprofen is not indicated for patients with severe inflammatory knee symptoms. • Given the heterogeneity among patients with knee osteoarthritis, potential subgroups should be explored in future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical RheumatologySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207