In‐Situ Heating X‐Ray Diffraction of LiNi <sub>0.6</sub> Mn <sub>0.3</sub> Co <sub>0.1</sub> O <sub>2</sub> and LiNi <sub>0.7</sub> Mn <sub>0.3</sub> O <sub>2</sub> Made Using the All‐Dry Synthesis Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In‐situ synthesis X‐ray diffraction is conducted at the Canadian Light Source to probe phase changes during the all‐dry synthesis of LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.3 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC631) and LiNi 0.7 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NM73) made using either LiOH·H 2 O or Li 2 CO 3 . All materials are heated up to 950 °C and held for one hour at 950 °C under flowing oxygen. The pathway to a layered phase is similar for all samples. First, a lithiated manganese oxide phase is formed at low temperature, then cations are incorporated into a rock salt phase from ≈420 °C. A spinel intermediary phase is formed before cation ordering occurs between Li and transition metal ions above 800 °C, giving rise to the intended layered hexagonal structure. Amongst the three materials tested, the layered phase of NMC631 (made using LiOH·H 2 O) evolves at the lowest temperature of ≈820 °C and refines rapidly during the high temperature hold. The melting of LiOH coincides nicely with the oxidation of Ni, which forms the basis for the rock salt structure. It is postulated that the molten LiOH facilitates cation diffusion into the rock salt phase, allowing for an earlier formation of the layered phase in comparison to using Li 2 CO 3 , which has a higher decomposition temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it