MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sustainable Management of Post-Consumer Pharmaceutical Waste: Assessing International Take-Back Programs and Advanced Disposal Technologies for Environmental Protection

2022· article· en· W4411623226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faith Osaretin Osabuohien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemistry and Chemical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessWaste managementEnvironmental planningEngineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The improper disposal of post-consumer pharmaceutical waste poses significant threats to environmental and public health, as trace pharmaceuticals increasingly contaminate water bodies, soil, and food chains. This paper explores sustainable management practices for post-consumer pharmaceutical waste by critically assessing international drug take-back programs and evaluating advanced disposal technologies aimed at mitigating environmental hazards. Drawing on case studies from countries such as Sweden, Canada, the United States, and Japan, the study analyzes the effectiveness, scalability, and public engagement strategies of diverse pharmaceutical return schemes. These programs, often operated through pharmacies and municipal waste systems, demonstrate varying degrees of success influenced by regulatory frameworks, public awareness, and stakeholder collaboration. In addition to programmatic evaluation, this study examines advanced disposal technologies such as high-temperature incineration, plasma gasification, and emerging chemical neutralization processes. Each method is evaluated in terms of environmental impact, energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility for widespread adoption. Particular attention is given to challenges faced by low- and middle-income countries, including infrastructure deficits and regulatory inconsistencies, which hinder effective implementation of sustainable waste management practices. The findings suggest that while take-back programs are essential for public participation and upstream waste control, their success depends on strong policy mandates, continuous education, and incentives for proper disposal. Moreover, integrating green chemistry principles and decentralized treatment models can further enhance sustainability in pharmaceutical waste management. The paper concludes by proposing a comprehensive framework that combines community-based collection initiatives, robust regulatory oversight, and the deployment of advanced disposal technologies tailored to regional contexts. This integrated approach is vital for minimizing pharmaceutical pollution and ensuring long-term environmental protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary ResearchSame topicChemistry and Chemical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207