Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging from the ontological gesture of Letting Be—first articulated in the development of Dynamic Presencing (DP) (Gunnlaugson, 2020–2025) and later integrated at the heart of Dynamic Presencing Coaching (DPC) (Gunnlaugson, 2024a–2025)—this article introduces three holding gestures that deepen presencing from a mode of knowing into an embodied and participatory way of being. While Letting Go, Letting Be, and Letting Come establish foundational process movements for deepened presencing, the addition of Holding Presence, Holding Depth, and Holding Emergence introduces three ontological holding environments that stabilize and catalyze this transformation. These gestures unfold through a dimensional progression of three phases—Enfolding into Presence, Indwelling in Presence, and Unfolding Presencing Emergence—each corresponding to a distinct stage of presencing: Presence, Deep Presencing, and Dynamic Presencing. When integrated, the letting and holding gestures form a dynamic choreography between receptive openness and generative participation. Embodied within the DPC Process-Method, this integrated movement invites a deeply sourced and sovereign engagement with the relational, somatic, and emergent dimensions of presencing, enabling practitioners in leadership, coaching, and related fields to cultivate new forms and stages of presencing mastery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".