Tinjauan Sistematis: Gambaran Quarter-life Crisis, Dampak, serta Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhinya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-life crisis (QLC) bertindak sebagai faktor risiko tambahan bagi emerging adult yang rentan mengalami permasalahan psikologis. Penelitian seputar QLC masih relatif baru, dan tinjauan sistematis ini bertujuan untuk membahas perkembangan penelitian QLC. Melalui sintesis artikel terpilih (N = 7), ditemukan bahwa jalur dari QLC terdiri dari lima fase yang mungkin dilalui, namun urutannya akan amat bergantung pada situasi dan kondisi yang dimiliki. QLC memiliki dampak negatif berupa pengalaman emosional negatif, khususnya terkait indikasi depresi yang tinggi dan rendahnya tingkat kesejahteraan. Dampak negatif tersebut terjadi pada kelima fase QLC, dan mengalami puncaknya pada fase yang disebut locked-out. Tinjauan ini juga menemukan bahwa budaya berperan dalam menentukan ekspektasi atau tuntutan sosial seperti apa yang menjadi sumber tekanan dari QLC. Penelitian ke depannya dapat mempertimbangkan untuk meneliti lebih lanjut seputar dampak dari tidak terselesaikannya QLC pada tahapan perkembangan berikutnya, faktor-faktor protektif, serta pengembangan alat ukur QLC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".