MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Use of intravenous magnesium sulfate in addition to standard first-line treatment with inhaled/nebulised short-acting beta 2 agonist and systemic steroids in the management of acute asthma exacerbations in children: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

2025· review· en· W4411634339 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Abdalla Hamud, Khalid Mudawi, Colin Powell, Suhail Al‐Saleh, Ramadan Salem, Naim Alnasif, Amjad Tonbari, Aiman Zou Zou, Adham Alhaji, Abdul K. Pullattayil, Ibtihal Abdelgadir

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Disease in Childhood · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicMagnesium in Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectExacerbationAsthmaRelative riskIntensive care unitRandomized controlled trialMechanical ventilationAnesthesiaInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The role of intravenous magnesium sulfate in asthma exacerbation is unclear. Aims To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous magnesium sulfate in managing asthma exacerbation in children. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Web of Science up to May 2024. We included randomised controlled trials and followed the international guidelines for conducting systematic reviews. Outcomes included morbidity, escalation of care, length of hospital stay, lung functions, adverse events, and mortality. Results Nine studies (total participants=473) were included. Hospitalisation rate and the need for non-invasive ventilation were less among the intravenous magnesium sulfate group (mean difference (MD)=0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90, I 2 7%, n=115) and (risk ratio (RR)=0.17, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.54, p=0.003, n=143), respectively. Asthma severity scores (MD=−0.18, 95% CI −1.35 to 0.98, I 2 2%, n=115), length of hospital stay (MD=−78.86, 95% CI −200.37 to 42.66, I 2 99%, n=284) and the need for invasive ventilation (RR=0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.17, I 2 0%, n=237) were similar. There was no difference in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission rate (p=0.43 n=61). Peak expiratory flow improved in the intravenous magnesium group (p<0.001, n=20). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion We found low-certainty evidence that intravenous magnesium sulfate results in a lower hospitalisation rate and less need for non-invasive ventilation. Asthma scores, PICU admission, invasive ventilation and length of hospital stay were similar. While the evidence base is weak, the favourable safety profile suggests that intravenous magnesium sulfate can be considered a treatment for asthma exacerbations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023405261.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.028
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Disease in ChildhoodSame topicMagnesium in Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207