MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detonation cellular regularity: A data analysis

2025· article· en· W4411637015 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xian Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion and Flame · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchUniversity of OttawaStanford University
KeywordsDetonationChemistryComputer scienceMechanicsExplosive materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detonation cellular regularity describes the spatial organization of the cellular patterns that emerge from the unsteady shock interactions within a propagating detonation. This study introduces the regularity index (RI), a quantitative metric derived from the spatial distribution of triple-point collision locations recorded on soot foils. The RI provides a robust and accessible approach for characterizing cellular regularity and leverages the extensive archive of soot foil measurements in the literature. Over 100 soot foils were analyzed to calculate RI values, enabling a systematic evaluation of the relationship between cellular regularity and key detonation properties. Among the properties considered, the effective activation energy ( ɛ i ) emerged as the most effective predictor of regularity, with higher ɛ i correlating with high RI values, indicating increasingly irregular cellular structures. In contrast, the stability parameter ( χ ), traditionally used to describe detonation instability, exhibited limited applicability across the broader dataset. The discrepancies originate from large uncertainties in calculating χ and related properties when different chemical kinetic modes were used, underscoring the need for improved chemical kinetic knowledge under detonation-relevant conditions. New soot foil measurements were performed for acetylene–oxygen, acetylene–oxygen–argon, and hydrogen–oxygen mixtures, where χ had previously been proposed as an effective measure for regularity. The derived RI values as well as the visual inspection of the new soot foils confirmed the strong correlation between ɛ i and cellular regularity. Overall, the regularity index concept was shown to effectively capture cellular regularity, and offers opportunities for future quantitative analyses of detonation dynamics involving regularity. Novelty and significance statement This work introduces a new metric, the regularity index (RI), for quantitatively characterizing detonation cellular regularity. By analyzing a comprehensive dataset of over 100 soot foils and conducting new experiments, the study establishes the effective activation energy ( ɛ i ) as the most reliable predictor of cellular regularity. Moreover, the broader applicability of the stability parameter ( χ ) to cellular regularity was evaluated, and only a weak correlation, if any, was observed. The previously reported trends were shown to result from chemical kinetic models with significant uncertainties under detonation-relevant conditions. Finally, this research establishes a data-driven framework to connect detonation properties with cellular structures and offers opportunities for future quantitative analyses of detonation dynamics involving cellular regularity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombustion and FlameSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207